Your “revolution”ends at the borders of the others revolution, like the borders of your private properties. Our freedom ends by the borders of the thieves of logos, parties, political movements, and who claims to be democratic . Every thief has a property that can’t be stolen by the other thieves.

The leaders of the world know very well the differences between revolutions, and know which one is worthy to be supported, which is worthy to be oppressed, and which should be simply neglected. Even the international organizations deal with peoples in the same logic. Some revolutions are the result of the real needs of the people according to which the ruler of a country has lost his “legitimacy”. Other revolutions lead to catastrophic events that need restraint.

All revolutions are different and have different circumstances and background. No one can never forget Gadhafy and his efforts to exterminate his people. When talking about revolution , one should expect anything; deceitful people, liars, and even killers.

When talking about the Arab revolutions, we find actual discrimination and different kinds of dictators; there are friends dictators and others enemies, Arabs dictators and foreign ones, Muslim dictators and christian ones. Some revolutions need the immediate interference, as the revolution in Libya, in which planes from the whole world moved to party, destroying the whole Government properties of an Arab country claiming to protect citizens.

In another revolution, like the Syrian one, the international community asks the president to “restraint”, and welcomes the intentions to “start reformation” .

The Turkish prime minister Ragab Tayeb Ordoghan has asked the former president Mubarak to respond to the demands of the people at 25th January revolution. And at the same time, the Turkish government confiscates the rights of the Kurds within the borders of their state .

Iran has supported the Egyptian revolution, but stood Idly in front of the Syrian one. Iran even helped the Syrian regime to suppress the Syrian and repress the Iranian dissidents. They even occupied “Al Ahwaz” and the three UAE islands, and also assassinate activists of "MKO" at Camp Ashraf inside the Iraqi border. 


The world politicians have two faces, a kind and evil one. The world of politicians is full of liars who imposed the air embargo on Libya claiming to protect citizens, and at the same time turned a blind eye to the aerial bombardment launched by Israel two days later against civilians in Palestine, which killed more than 20 martyrs and hundreds of wounded.

This world banned the “resistance” of the occupied countries and called it “terrorism”. And here it is welcoming the revolutions against leaders. And even at such special moment , makes exceptions for the “pamper” child Israel giving the permission to kill.

When asking Sarkozy, who rushed to bomb Libya as if he was revenging from Gadhafy, why all this contradiction? I guess he will answer :”it’s different thing” .
And when asking Rasmussen, the Danish Prime of the Danish NATO, he will answer the same.

When talking about the Arab revolutions, we find the good and bad, the real hero and the thief, and the real pro and the hypocrite who succeeds to seize the chance in his favor. It is so far from freedom. There are also “actors” who play and acting believing that the people trust them. This category pretends to support the Arab revolutions, but their peoples suffer from oppression and dictatorship.

The media “knights” speak all the time about the honor of the profession while they gain their salary at the end of every month from their “boss of thieves”. They speak about freedom and revolutions while they are restricted.

And if they met each others, each of them wonder how can he met the other in such place. The world of the Arab revolutions is very confusing and full of contradictions, no one can differentiate between who is right and who is wrong, who is honest and who is the liar.

In the world of the Arab revolutions, we should differentiate between the martyr and the thug, rebellious and revolutionary pretending. We should know who is the reformer and who is the dictator.