The Arab media means often mention the word " Political Player " and I don’t  know weather it was just a metaphor aimed at making sense and mitigation of the word " political " , which has be come recently and in many times a word of a bad repartition , like what was embodied in an Egyptian movie " The Dancer and the politician "

Is the goal is to propagate for the politician wring the most popular game in the world , football , to make his job move interesting although many people hate it , because it is connected with the following defeats and crises from which many citizens suffered from . Or , Ts the politician a real player , like the footballs who plays well and scores goals or loses games and blamed by his fans ?

The international policy is very similar to sport competitions, where there are Finals and semifinals, and Fans are divided into first class and middle class. Also the players, there are players who are hired by millions and others who are sent off.

There are some games which the fans enjoy watching them, and there are others which are so boring and bad. There are also some competitions bayed on honesty and others based on bribes for players and judging. There are honest games while there are dirty one including douses, incivility, and fighting, and many other illegal acts.

Let’s suppose that the politician is a player, so there must be some game and some rivals and also judges.

There is no game in the world without players, judges, and spectators. Of coarse there are some plays in which spectators are not necessary like chess, or some times people in charge decide to establish the match behind closed doors to avoid violence and riot that take place in different places in the world.

So, if the spectators are not necessary, the judges and the rivals are. There is no match without judges or rivals , or it would be no longer a match , bat an individual sporting activity practiced by a single person , like walk on the conveyor , weight lifting , or boxing in the ail .

But what happens if the player insisted to come down to the stadium alone, play alone, score goals alone, and scream joyfully alone. Of coarse every one will think that he must be crazy. Of coarse ho one would like to attend such game and the player for sale will be taken to a psychiatric hospital.

This is very common in policy, many of the politic systems play alone, and they monopolized the power and prevented any one from sharing and ruling. The system then acts exactly like the football player in the last example; playing alone, score the goals alone, and encourage himself.

Most of the authoritarian systems in the world stand against history and the laws of nature. They monopolize the power for decades. There are no games but only they announce themselves periodically the single authority in the country. But with the growing international pressures for democracy, freedom and political pluralism, some authorities have decided to surrender to these pressures and prepare for the first time for honest games, sorry I mean honest multi-party elections.

But because these systems lack the fitness, popularity, and the ability to play honestly, they decided to make a trick. They decided to compete with only the weaker player. Not only that, but to ensure their winning; they hired a judge from then own team. And as soon as the game starts, the authorities will hit their weak rivals as happens in the action movies, and during the first round the players will be defeated and the hired judge will announce the winner, and of cause it will be the authority!

Democracy in Arab countries, which is practiced by the dictator ruling systems, allows the ruling party to win in every election with percent, exceeds 9900. Such kind of democracy cannot deceive the poor helpless people any more. It is not convincing any more in the world of enlightenment, which tracks every movement.

The democracy practiced by dictator systems can't be called democracy, actually it is dictatorship. People refused and resisted such systems dozens of times, but they insist on staying and ruling, despite the angry crowds ' cry “we are done, enough “. In the time when most peoples enjoy the real democracy which means political pluralism , enjoy the right of every citizen to run for the presidency , and enjoy honest fair elections Dn the contrary ; the Arab systems still insist on playing alone or using the hired players .

Politicians are real players, but they don’t know the game rules, and the Arab judges are old and also have no idea about the game rules. The players are old and lacking the fitness and don’t know how to play honestly. They insist on playing in a stadium where there is no rivals nor judges, nor spectators.