Cairo : Alamir Kamal Farag .

I am a big fan of the famous British newspaper "Daily Mail", they provide a model for modern journalism that fit all readers today, and probably also the reason why it is so comprehensive; it is primarily social, and then followed by other concerns, including policy, which fits the market, and attracts the reader that fatigue of the normal politics News.

This admiration makes me more accurate about any published material, and, of course, this helped me on several observations. it made me observed that the newspaper publishes a subject and then re-release it after years .. the same identical subject, even identical pictures, but the only change is in some of the details, and the name of the editor and of course changing the date of publication.
Of course, if this happened in an Arab, it would be like a disaster. Where editors considered it as an offense to Arab press, but it seems that the British press has different rules.

Previously, the newspaper questioned the justification for the redeployment of some subjects in this manner? And for what aim? But due to my love for "Daily Mail", I always used to seek excuses, considering it as an attempt to attract the market.
But the days pass and found this phenomenon repeated in the "Daily Mail" specifically, where I discovered a repeat during the last few weeks about a story of two Australian girls escaped from their country and joined ISIS, which was mainly published last year, and re-published again few weeks ago.

Today I discovered a new fact:

On 09/20/2013 the newspaper published a report on "photographer taking pictures terrifying Koreans girls who had undergone a plastic surgeries, published under the name of " Helen Bo, and the same topic re-published on 10/12/2015 by :" Loren Brown", but by a different title.

Theoretically the reader will think that the editor Lauren Brown stole the topic from Helen Bo. This is a possibility, but if we adopt this view, how the editor in chief could ignore such a great matter in a famous newspaper like "Daily Mail"?.

As if there were other justifications for the newspaper like marketing, for example, we should know, the editor in chief of the prestigious daily newspaper should come out to explain to the readers the reason for re-publication in this way that is similar to the corresponding head?.

The following is the first report of a link, and the link beneath the second report, to read and judge.

The first report and its link title:

Candid photos captured immediately after cosmetic surgery expose the extraordinary lengths South Korean women will go to look more Western

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2426412/Ji-Yeo-How-bruises-scars-plastic-surgery-longer-considered-risky-extravagant-necessary-Korea.html


The second report and its link title:

The painful price of perfection: How the bruises and scars of plastic surgery are no longer feared in South Korea where it has become the norm to be surgically enhanced

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3266582/Candid-photos-captured-cosmetic-surgery-expose-extraordinary-lengths-Asian-women-look-Western.html